sorry but i missed it.
He offered 2-1 odds that you can't pick 60% winners over 100 pick period.
but it is so damn funny.
especially the home made lines some guys use.
especially the home made lines some guys use.
It's about pickin winnas yo
only 100 plays? lots of people around here could do that on such a low number of plays. were there rules to keep people off moneylines, or only on certain sports or something?
It's a cheap stale version of the Hamneggs football challenge. Same concept but with a JIVE twist to it
-300 ML counts as +1 game if you win -3 games if you lose
-300 ML counts as +1 game if you win -3 games if you lose
"only 100 plays? lots of people around here could do that on such a low number of plays."
Easier said than done dude.
The answer should be that, A lot of people here "THINK" that they can do it.
Easier said than done dude.
The answer should be that, A lot of people here "THINK" that they can do it.
with the rules this guy has in place, i think quite a few people could do it. just betting big moneyline favorites would make it simple.
he doesnt even limit what the wagers are.
he doesnt even limit what the wagers are.
RPM -- Moneyline Favorites count more than a single pick. For example, you have 100 picks to go 60%. Picking a team at -700 means risking 7 of your picks, SO near the end, when you have picked 94 games, you can't use this same ML Fav. because you would have exceeded the 100 plays.
Also, say this ML Fav. LOSES, you just lost 7 games
Also, say this ML Fav. LOSES, you just lost 7 games
I think with all this talk of moneylines, parlays, teasers & props, it steers away from my initial thoughts that "no one in here can pick 60% winners through 100 games". I had based this opinion on the results I saw in this Forum over the last couple of years--whereas MOST EVERYONE either put up sides or totals.
If someone were to put up Teaser bets, parlays, and big ML FAVS. as their picks on a daily basis, he'd get run out of here in a week. Especially on ML FAVS., people would start calling him a SQUARE, CHALKER, etc. and he'd constantly be bashed for trying to take the easy road. (I happen to know ,first hand, how most of you guys get relentless in your bashing). Also, who has the kind of Bankroll to supplement -400,-500 & up ML Favorites? Very few people. In my opinion, playing these kinds of odds are NOT COMMON--at least, I RARELY see it here.
Just give me your BEST regular plays!
If someone were to put up Teaser bets, parlays, and big ML FAVS. as their picks on a daily basis, he'd get run out of here in a week. Especially on ML FAVS., people would start calling him a SQUARE, CHALKER, etc. and he'd constantly be bashed for trying to take the easy road. (I happen to know ,first hand, how most of you guys get relentless in your bashing). Also, who has the kind of Bankroll to supplement -400,-500 & up ML Favorites? Very few people. In my opinion, playing these kinds of odds are NOT COMMON--at least, I RARELY see it here.
Just give me your BEST regular plays!
I should have been more SPECIFIC in my challenge to say, "Give me you BEST STRAIGHT WAGER --SIDE OR TOTAL -- and I will prove to you that you can't hit 60% winnas over 100 games" and left it at that.
My mistake. Who would've figured this?
I still know that NO ONE in here has that ability.
My mistake. Who would've figured this?
I still know that NO ONE in here has that ability.
why would I take it
if I did I would only use 5 unit picks.that would put the contest in the year to year and a 1/2 range.
good luck
panther
if I did I would only use 5 unit picks.that would put the contest in the year to year and a 1/2 range.
good luck
panther
